Constitution by adopting the Reconstruction Amendments. In addition to enacting laws, the nation transformed the U.S. Historical underpinnings of affirmative actionįollowing the Civil War, the nation grappled with building a multiracial democracy.Ĭongress sought to construct that new democracy in part by enacting laws that provided race-conscious remedies. Thomas’ views are in stark contrast with those of the two other justices of color – Sonia Sotomayor, a Latina, and Ketanji Brown Jackson, a Black woman.Īs scholars of constitutional law and civil rights, we believe that the ideological disagreements among the justices of color reflect the national division over how to address the legacies of slavery, Jim Crow and modern-day inequalities. Supreme Court that allow the use of race as a factor in college admissions. Justice Clarence Thomas, a leading Black conservative, is a well-known opponent of affirmative action programs and recent decisions by the U.S. The court, for example, demonstrated its willingness to reconsider landmark rulings when it overturned the 1973 abortion decision in Roe v. If the court were to ban affirmative action, the decision would be part of a larger, profound conservative transformation of constitutional law. Harvard and Students for Fair Admissions v. And that majority has the power to ban the use of race when the court issues a decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. Though the court is the most diverse in American history – with three justices of color and four women – the conservatives, who have historically opposed affirmative action programs, hold a 6-3 majority. The United States Supreme Court is deciding a pair of cases that could end affirmative action programs that consider race in college admissions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |